Abstract
The future is often portrayed as rational, logical, and informed by the continuing achievements of the scientific and technological revolution. In similar ways, our own time was seen as marked by such advances by futurists of earlier decades. But at the end of the twentieth century, resistance to the claims of mainstream science and technology has grown to an extent unanticipated in these earlier appraisals. This essay argues that such resistance is liable to flourish in the twenty-first century, and that understanding why this should be the case is important for studies of the future. In particular, this essay takes up the Fortean approach. This approach examines areas of human experience that are "damned" by mainstream science, and also examines the processes and strategies adopted both by those effecting the damnation, and those challenging it. The case being made is that although we can expect many of these damned phenomena to remain excluded - deservedly so in some cases - this will not always be the case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-90 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Foresight |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Keywords
- Process innovation
- Science
- Technology