Work environments, stress, and productivity: An examination using ASSET

Ian Donald, Paul Taylor, Sheena Johnson, Cary Cooper, Susan Cartwright, Susannah Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this study (N = 16,001), the predictors of productivity (i.e., work performance) were investigated with A Shortened Stress Evaluation Tool (E. B. Faragher, C. L. Cooper, & S. Cartwright, 2004), which incorporates individual work stressors, stress outcomes (physical and psychological wellbeing), and commitment (both to and from an organization). Psychological well-being, commitment from the organization to the employee, and resources were found to be predictive. Physical health, individual work stressors (with the exception of resources), and commitment from the employee to the organization were not identified as important. The findings are discussed with reference to both previous and future research. The large sample size and broad range of occupations included suggest the findings are generalizable to other employee groupings. Implications for both stress and management theory are discussed. Copyright 2005 by the Educational Publishing Foundation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-423
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Stress Management
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2005

Keywords

  • Commitment
  • Productivity
  • Psychological well-being
  • Stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Work environments, stress, and productivity: An examination using ASSET'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this