TY - BOOK
T1 - Workflows Community Summit
T2 - Workflows Community Summit
AU - Silva, Rafael Ferreira da
AU - Casanova, Henri
AU - Chard, Kyle
AU - Laney, Dan
AU - Ahn, Dong
AU - Jha, Shantenu
AU - Goble, Carole A.
AU - Ramakrishnan, Lavanya
AU - Peterson, Luc
AU - Enders, Bjoern
AU - Thain, Douglas
AU - Altintas, Ilkay
AU - Babuji, Yadu N.
AU - Badia, Rosa M.
AU - Bonazzi, Vivien
AU - Coleman, Tainã
AU - Crusoe, Michael R.
AU - Deelman, Ewa
AU - Natale, Frank Di
AU - Tommaso, Paolo Di
AU - Fahringer, Thomas
AU - Filgueira, Rosa
AU - Fursin, Grigori
AU - Ganose, Alex
AU - Gruning, Bjorn
AU - Katz, Daniel S.
AU - Kuchar, Olga
AU - Kupresanin, Ana
AU - Ludäscher, Bertram
AU - Maheshwari, Ketan
AU - Mattoso, Marta
AU - Mehta, Kshitij
AU - Munson, Todd
AU - Ozik, Jonathan
AU - Peterka, Tom
AU - Pottier, Loic
AU - Randles, Tim
AU - Soiland-Reyes, Stian
AU - Tovar, Benjamín
AU - Turilli, Matteo
AU - Uram, Thomas D.
AU - Vahi, Karan
AU - Wilde, Michael
AU - Wolf, Matthew
AU - Wozniak, Justin M.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Scientific workflows have been used almost universally across scientific domains, and have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past several decades. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale high-performance computing (HPC) platforms. These executions must be managed using some software infrastructure. Due to the popularity of workflows, workflow management systems (WMSs) have been developed to provide abstractions for creating and executing workflows conveniently, efficiently, and portably. While these efforts are all worthwhile, there are now hundreds of independent WMSs, many of which are moribund. As a result, the WMS landscape is segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. As a result, many teams, small and large, still elect to build their own custom workflow solution rather than adopt, or build upon, existing WMSs. This current state of the WMS landscape negatively impacts workflow users, developers, and researchers. The "Workflows Community Summit" was held online on January 13, 2021. The overarching goal of the summit was to develop a view of the state of the art and identify crucial research challenges in the workflow community. Prior to the summit, a survey sent to stakeholders in the workflow community (including both developers of WMSs and users of workflows) helped to identify key challenges in this community that were translated into 6 broad themes for the summit, each of them being the object of a focused discussion led by a volunteer member of the community. This report documents and organizes the wealth of information provided by the participants before, during, and after the summit.
AB - Scientific workflows have been used almost universally across scientific domains, and have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the past several decades. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale high-performance computing (HPC) platforms. These executions must be managed using some software infrastructure. Due to the popularity of workflows, workflow management systems (WMSs) have been developed to provide abstractions for creating and executing workflows conveniently, efficiently, and portably. While these efforts are all worthwhile, there are now hundreds of independent WMSs, many of which are moribund. As a result, the WMS landscape is segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. As a result, many teams, small and large, still elect to build their own custom workflow solution rather than adopt, or build upon, existing WMSs. This current state of the WMS landscape negatively impacts workflow users, developers, and researchers. The "Workflows Community Summit" was held online on January 13, 2021. The overarching goal of the summit was to develop a view of the state of the art and identify crucial research challenges in the workflow community. Prior to the summit, a survey sent to stakeholders in the workflow community (including both developers of WMSs and users of workflows) helped to identify key challenges in this community that were translated into 6 broad themes for the summit, each of them being the object of a focused discussion led by a volunteer member of the community. This report documents and organizes the wealth of information provided by the participants before, during, and after the summit.
UR - https://workflowsri.org/summits/community
U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.4606958
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.4606958
M3 - Other report
BT - Workflows Community Summit
PB - Zenodo
Y2 - 13 January 2021
ER -