"Worst Cases" Reimagined in a post-COVID Context

Sonja D. Schmid, Başak Saraç-Lesavre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We argue that the post-Fukushima nuclear safety debates in the United States and Europe fundamentally altered the definition of nuclear safety. In the United States, the industry effectively took control by strengthening technical measures as the solution to nuclear safety concerns. In France, technical solutions were part of the process, but they were less dominant than in the United States and were overshadowed by larger organizational shuffles. The European Union, in contrast, engaged in a drawn-out debate over the very definition of nuclear safety, resulting in a stress test initiative that, while cumbersome and frustrating to many, included truly deliberative elements and ultimately revealed just how precarious the definitions of control and nuclear safety were.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
Volume19
Issue number17
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Fukushima
  • France
  • nuclear policy
  • nuclear energy
  • EU
  • USA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"Worst Cases" Reimagined in a post-COVID Context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this