You can have your cake and eat it too: Embracing paradox of safety as source of progress in safety science

Xiaowen Hu, Tristan Casey, Mark Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Safety is typically cast as a trade-off with other priorities, such as production and efficiency. Such an approach sets up dramatic tension between organisational goals—an ‘either-or’ situation. Alternatively, safety can be framed as something that can be achieved simultaneously with other goals—a ‘both-and’ situation. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the paradoxical nature of safety and to explore how paradoxical insights might advance safety research and practices. We integrate the organisational paradox and safety literature to explore the nature of safety paradoxes and how organisations can manage them using different strategies. We then move on to discuss the implications for micro-level safety leadership and performance research. Finally, we explore the paradoxical nature of safety management in practice by highlighting emerging safety paradoxes that result from digitisation, diversification, and increasing complexity, and provide recommendations to manage them.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104824
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalSafety Science
Volume130
Early online date10 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • paradox
  • future of safety
  • safety leadership
  • safety performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'You can have your cake and eat it too: Embracing paradox of safety as source of progress in safety science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this