TY - JOUR
T1 - Zero-waste circular economy of plastic packaging
T2 - The bottlenecks and a way forward
AU - Novakovic, Katarina
AU - Thumbarathy, Deepashree
AU - Peeters, Marloes
AU - Geoghegan, Mark
AU - Go Jefferies, Josephine
AU - Hicks, Chris
AU - Manika, Danae
AU - Dai, Sheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Interest in recycling is higher than ever, with the recycling of plastic packaging waste being a significant concern for the general public and governments worldwide. However, the rate of plastic packaging waste recycling has stagnated over the past five years. This implies current strategies are insufficient and new approaches are required. We evaluate the present situation and highlight the bottlenecks that are limiting efficient recovery of plastic packaging waste using currently available systems. Difficult to recycle thermoplastics such as polystyrene and poly(vinyl chloride) are not needed in packaging, which we propose should be based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polypropylene (PP), high-density and low-density polyethylene (HDPE and LDPE respectively). Furthermore, we draw attention to the opportunity for keeping PET/PP packaging as a single waste stream, and leaving HDPE and LDPE as a standalone stream, to enable efficient plastic separation of individual types of plastic for mechanical recycling to achieve a zero-waste circular economy for all plastic packaging.
AB - Interest in recycling is higher than ever, with the recycling of plastic packaging waste being a significant concern for the general public and governments worldwide. However, the rate of plastic packaging waste recycling has stagnated over the past five years. This implies current strategies are insufficient and new approaches are required. We evaluate the present situation and highlight the bottlenecks that are limiting efficient recovery of plastic packaging waste using currently available systems. Difficult to recycle thermoplastics such as polystyrene and poly(vinyl chloride) are not needed in packaging, which we propose should be based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polypropylene (PP), high-density and low-density polyethylene (HDPE and LDPE respectively). Furthermore, we draw attention to the opportunity for keeping PET/PP packaging as a single waste stream, and leaving HDPE and LDPE as a standalone stream, to enable efficient plastic separation of individual types of plastic for mechanical recycling to achieve a zero-waste circular economy for all plastic packaging.
KW - Circular economy
KW - Mechanical recycling
KW - Plastic packaging
KW - Plastic waste
KW - Recycling
KW - Zero waste
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173541972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00735
DO - 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00735
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173541972
SN - 2214-9937
VL - 38
JO - Sustainable Materials and Technologies
JF - Sustainable Materials and Technologies
M1 - e00735
ER -