If international agreements regarding the need to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions are to be met then there is a high probability that the shipping industry will have to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. For emission reductions from ships greater than around 40% then alternatives to fossil fuels - such as nuclear energy - will very likely be required.Whilst nuclear powered ships have successfully operated at sea for a number of decades, these have been primarily naval systems (or derivatives of naval systems such as icebreakers) and a few demonstration projects using reactors with low power outputs. The operational requirement for large civilian vessels (for example high capacity factors and limited personnel) mean the naval and past demonstration reactor systems are ill-suited for use in the current fleet of commercial container ships.There have been relatively few studies performed addressing the likely requirements upon core design a marine reactor would have to meet. This study addresses those issues and also implements a Pressurised Water Reactor core design capable of achieving these requirements. Furthermore, in order to simplify reactor operation for a limited number of personnel on board, the chemical reactivity control system has been eliminated during power operation. This has resulted in a novel low power density core that does not require refuelling for 15 years. The neutronic and fuel performance behaviour of this system has been studied with conventional UO2 fuel and thorium-uranium oxide ((Th,U)O2) fuel.With respect to (Th,U)O2 fuel there has been limited analysis comparing the performance of key fuel characteristics, such as fission gas release and thermal conductivity, as a function of uranium content in (Th,U)O2 fuel and their impact on fuel behaviour. Furthermore, the performance of neutronic codes for modelling Th-232 and U-233 from a variety of experiments using modern nuclear data libraries (post 1990) is lacking. Both of these issues are addressed in this study.Whilst it is frequently stated that thorium-based oxide fuel is superior to UO2 fuel it was found that due to the sensitivity of thermal conductivity on temperature and uranium content this was not true for the core designed in this study. The (Th,U)O2 core showed no net economic benefits with respect to the UO2 core and it was found that the fuel performance of (Th,U)O2 fuel was worse than the UO2 fuel in the reactor designed here. The UO2 core design, however, was able to satisfactorily meet the majority of requirements placed upon the system.
Date of Award | 1 Aug 2015 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | - The University of Manchester
|
---|
Supervisor | Timothy Abram (Supervisor) & Hywel Owen (Supervisor) |
---|
- High burnup
- Marine propulsion
- Thorium
- Long-life core
Development of a Long-Life Core for Commercial Marine Propulsion
Peakman, A. (Author). 1 Aug 2015
Student thesis: Phd