This thesis examines whether it is an abuse of human rights to prohibit and criminalise a medically useful controlled drug. Specifically therefore, it examines whether the regime of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 is compatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. As Article 8 is a qualified human right, it can be justified if infringement of it is a proportional interference in pursuit of a legitimate aim. This thesis argues, using medical cannabis as a case study, that such a justification cannot be mounted and the medical prohibition of a medically useful drug is, therefore, an abuse of human rights.
Date of Award | 1 Aug 2019 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Awarding Institution | - The University of Manchester
|
---|
Supervisor | Judith Aldridge (Supervisor) & Toby Seddon (Supervisor) |
---|
- drugs
- constitutional law
- human rights
- cannabis
- proportionality
Drugs and Human Rights: A constitutional approach
Ingram, K. (Author). 1 Aug 2019
Student thesis: Phd